> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Peter Donald wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:04, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > > >>The original concept was for Excalibur to house general Avalon > >>components and Cornerstone to house Phoenix components. I > would be -1 > >>on any movement of the components to cornerstone until we have an > >>official specification for Avalon components. > > > > Personally I would prefer if cornerstone components moved back from > > cornerstone to excalibur rather than the opposite way round. > > Well... if excalibur becomes the implementation of > Containers, Cornerstone becomes what Excalibur has become now > anyway... 8-S > > Ok, I'm confused. Why would you like to see them back in Excalibur? > > What do you propose as a role for the CVS modules? > > Current active proposal: > > - avalon-framework: APIS > - avalon-excalibur: Container Implementations > - avalon-cornerstone: ComponentImplementations > - avalon-apps: Server applications > > In this view, they should go to Cornerstone...
So far you are the only one with that vision. Let's not cross this bridge until we get there. There is a lot to be done now before we could even imagine restructuring the CVS archives. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
