Peter Donald wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:04, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>>The original concept was for Excalibur to house general Avalon
>>components and Cornerstone to house Phoenix components. I would
>>be -1 on any movement of the components to cornerstone until
>>we have an official specification for Avalon components.
>
> Personally I would prefer if cornerstone components moved back from
> cornerstone to excalibur rather than the opposite way round.
Well... if excalibur becomes the implementation of Containers,
Cornerstone becomes what Excalibur has become now anyway... 8-S
Ok, I'm confused. Why would you like to see them back in Excalibur?
What do you propose as a role for the CVS modules?
Current active proposal:
- avalon-framework: APIS
- avalon-excalibur: Container Implementations
- avalon-cornerstone: ComponentImplementations
- avalon-apps: Server applications
In this view, they should go to Cornerstone...
:-?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
