On Sunday 18 August 2002 04:34 am, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > I would like to start testing maven for integration into CVS. Avalons > > repos are not as easy to maintain hence a better build system would be > > great. The existing buid system would stick around until Maven is > > accepted or removed.
+1 on testing in parallel to ant. I would be -1 on having Maven be the primary build tool until it has a stable release. > -1 > > Maven is in beta. > I strongly oppose even slightly hinting that Avalon is built with a beta > build tool, also given that the POM and the descriptor are still in a > flux and still being discussed. > > If you want to test Maven, fine, but do it on your computer, not in CVS. > > As I said though, you can still supply the Maven descriptors in a > tools/maven dir. > This makes it possible for early Maven adopters to test Maven and for > regular users not to be confused. Pete is proposing the same as what jakarta-commons has. (Actually maybe even less intrusive, as I believe Maven is the standard build for some commons projects, versus being just a parallel testing build). -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
