> > Multiple containers are not only helpful, but they are absolutely > > necessary. > > We will never be able to converge on the most generic and useable > > container > > specifications when there is only one to choose from. Using different > > approaches that all work with the same components helps us to determine > > important criteria such as: > > I think a single container is a goal we should strive towards. Users > don't want to have to pick a container due to separate but overlapping > feature sets. We should strive towards a single container that is > pluggable to the point of satisfying many needs. I think the current > experimentations with multiple containers lets us push things into > different directions to see what we may want from that ubercontainer.
Lest people get confused or try to spin (me included) Peter, could you state whether you're for uber container now or in N years? Is this a hands off Phoenix declaration of sorts? - Paul __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
