> from: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Clazz is far from good for our purposes because it also tries to be a > reflection based mechanism. We need to load things without classes being > resolvable and so forth.
[clazz] has made no coding decisions with regards to attributes (meta-data) yet. Our intention is to provide pluggable implementations, of which commons [attributes] would probably be one. This gives Avalon a chance to get together some requirements and influence/help out [clazz] development. There's an opportunity here. Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
