[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Clazz is far from good for our purposes because it also tries to be a
reflection based mechanism. We need to load things without classes being
resolvable and so forth.
[clazz] has made no coding decisions with regards to attributes (meta-data) yet. Our intention is to provide pluggable implementations, of which commons [attributes] would probably be one.
This gives Avalon a chance to get together some requirements and influence/help out [clazz] development. There's an opportunity here.
+1 (as in I agree and I'm willing to contribute to the process)
Cheers, Steve.
Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
