[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Clazz is far from good for our purposes because it also tries to be a
reflection based mechanism. We need to load things without classes being
resolvable and so forth.
[clazz] has made no coding decisions with regards to attributes (meta-data) yet. Our intention is to provide pluggable implementations, of which commons [attributes] would probably be one.
This gives Avalon a chance to get together some requirements and influence/help out [clazz] development. There's an opportunity here.
Very cool. There is indeed a big opportunity.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
