> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> 
> 1) I'd like my name kept out of subject lines please.  

OK, done.
 
> > ... Then, once there are features in those containers that have 
> > withstood the tests of real-life deployment, should the features be 
> > merged back into framework and the reference container.
> 
> I disagree. We should keep the ref very light. I buy the idea 
> of "not intended for real deployments".

What I mean is that if the features result in additional
framework interfaces, there should be a reference implementation
for them.

This reference impl need not be heavy. (Consider
DefaultComponentManager).

/LS


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to