> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On that note we previously voted on whether to split > avalon-framework.jar into two* -> > avalon-framework-api.jar and avalon-framework-refimpl.jar. > Can someone run thru the votes and see > if we got majority. It was a week ago I think. Can't do it > myself as on webmail presently. Maybe > it needs crisping up a little bit before enacting.
I wasn't aware of that proposal/vote amid all the noise. -1 from me. There is no reason to split the framework into two jars. Not only is it already small, but the default implementations of the Configuration/Context/etc. are all part of the interface. I can't imagine what gains can be made by separating interface/implementation for the Jars. What about the Parameters object? There is no separate interface, although it is directly named in the Parameterizable interface. It provides no real benefit that I can see. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
