Leif Mortenson wrote:
What about setting it up so that a -1 is a vote by default. If someone reallyWe had this discussion on the incubator list.
wants to pull the veto card then they can specifically write -VETO or something
like that. This way people can safely vote their disapproval without it being
as strong as a veto. The ability to veto any vote will still be preserved this way.
-1 can be viewed as a simple vote without stepping on any toes. If a user
writes VETO on a vote, then they should be required to explain themselves
thoroughly.
It has been said that -1s are vetos, and majority votes where it's clear that a voting is in progress on majority rules.
This is the reason why I restated here the suggestion that had been done there to use -0.99 and variants to suggest strong disagreement without getting to a veto, in the cases where is would apply, and never use -1 just to express a non-binding opinion.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
