> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > It has been said that -1s are vetos, and majority votes where > it's clear that a voting is in progress on majority rules.
Seems reasonable. Short and simple. I think that instead of adding even more bureaucracy to the voting process with -VETO, -0.99, -0.9999... etc. we should go with the usual +1/-1. If someone vetoes anything, you can always ask if it is a veto, and if so, if there are any ways to make that someone take back the veto. Voting isn't rocket science, and I don't think we should need complex rules for it. Especially this veto thing has been given a real good "what is a valid veto", which shouldn't really be an issue, given sensible people. I would also assert that given non-sensible people, no voting procedure will help. As has been stated here, the important part isn't the voting, it is the discussion leading up to the vote. After that, voting is a formality. /LS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
