Berin Loritsch wrote:
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
Everything. It uses an enhanced Gump descriptor (and works with gump), where you define your src, test and docs dirs, has easy buildfile import capability, automatic plugin download and installation, ...The last time I tried centipede, it was a pain to get working. Maven has an easy declaritive document describing meta-info necessary for building the project. It is very intuitive. Centipede made me feel like I was forced into a box I didn't like for the directory structure. It just wasn't a pleasant experience. OTOH, I haven't looked at Centipede in quite a while. What has changed with it?
Just try it, it's way better. Also Maven has changed a lot since you have tried it in comparison with Centipede.
Hence I would propose here, as I did on the James list, to wait for the release of both products and decide. It's only fair for both projects.
DISCLAIMER: I'm the original author of Centipede.I know. ;P
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
