On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:24, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > You recall incorrectly. I would oppose dropping the ability to use anakia > > or whatever because those tools are much simpler and majority of our docs > > do not require complexities of cocoon. > > Forrest, we are talking about Forrest. And Forrest is really simple to > use, not complex.
Having used it as a user and not a developer - I disagree. > > However I notice that our doc builds are still not being maintained in > > any way shape or form and our website is still screwed in places ... Is > > it just me or would anyone else like to see them being maintained before > > any effort at changing to a more complex system that will take even more > > effort to maintain? > > Forrest is not more complex to use. So it isn't at all related with > maintainability with regards to this aspect. see above. > On the contrary, if we move all docs to the *same* format and buildtool, > it will certainly be easier to maintain. depends on the tool. > You have always had a "Just Do It" attitude on it. Actually I had a "Someone else do it" attitude. For about 1.5 years I begged someone to fix our documentation system. No one did. Theres was lots of people talking, lots of people saying they will do it but no action. So I started to fix our website. Funnily enough - as soon as I stopped fixing our website it got even worse and to this day is still unmaintainined. Who would have thunk it? -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------------------------ Mark Twain: "In the real world, the right thing never happens in the right place at the right time. It is the task of journalists and historians to rectify this error." ------------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
