On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:41, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Paul Hammant wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Have we chosen a xdocs->html technology for the avalon-site depot? > > > > Forrest, Anakia, Cocoon? > > Given that Forrest is to prefer to plain Cocoon since it's Cocoon based > but tailored for our use, and that the only one holding back IIRC on > Anakia has since then decided to use Forrest (see Phoenix docs), I'd > choose Forrest.
You recall incorrectly. I would oppose dropping the ability to use anakia or whatever because those tools are much simpler and majority of our docs do not require complexities of cocoon. I would be happy to see our complex doc processes (ie phoenix/framework) use forrest because they can benefit from the power. However I notice that our doc builds are still not being maintained in any way shape or form and our website is still screwed in places ... Is it just me or would anyone else like to see them being maintained before any effort at changing to a more complex system that will take even more effort to maintain? -- Cheers, Peter Donald *----------------------------------------------------* | "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey | *----------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
