We haven't reverted the HEAD, yet, just the v2.1 branch. My plan was to
submit Peter's revised handler to replace the HEAD. Stephen should pull
smtphandler.java from branch_2_1_fcs.
> In order to resolve this problem I would like to import the modified
> James sources into avalon-sandbox to enable James and Avalon people
> to dig into this.
Actually, I'm not sure that I see the point, so please clarify.
> from your e-mail it sounds like it makes more sense to me to
> add a branch to james cvs.
If there is something in James that needs to change that might make sense,
and we can arrange for commit rights, as was done previously for PeterD and
PaulH.
> I'm confident this is a Cornerstone/Exalibur change issue
> and we will need assistance from James people
If it isn't in James code, then why do we need a separate copy of the James
source in the CVS? And if it is, then I think it should be done in our
module.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter M. Goldstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 13:39
To: 'Avalon Developers List'
Subject: RE: Excalibur/Cornerstone/James woes
Stephen,
Are you sure this isn't a config problem? Ignoring the empty command for
the moment, it looks like your mail to "test@localhost" is being routed to
RemoteDelivery for processing. Maybe because it's in the spammer blacklist?
A posted configuration file might help immensely. Also, it would probably
be desirable to flip on debug for all the individual mailets if you haven't
done so already.
I've got a (somewhat modified) version of James that uses the current
Cornerstone classes (haven't upgraded all of the Excalibur ones), has
undergone the Composable->Serviceable change, and runs inside Phoenix.
Seems to work ok. I'd be happy to share source code with you if you so
desire.
Also, does your source have the post-2.1 patch that altered the SMTP handler
data buffering? As that patch was in error, and has since been reverted, it
may be causing some of your empty command woes. The empty command you are
observing is symptomatic of a bug introduced with that patch. Please see
james-dev for a discussion.
--Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:17 AM
> To: Avalon Developers List; James Developers List
> Subject: Excalibur/Cornerstone/James woes
>
>
> Guys:
>
> It looks like my earlier note concerning success with James was
> premature. I'm back experiencing an loop inside James mail processing
> and have not been able to isolate the problem.
>
> Relevant points:
>
> 1. build of James, Cornerstone and Excalibur related resources
> are all from current CVS
> 2. James sources have been updated locally to support the service
> package (to sync with Cornerstone changes)
>
> Some important notes:
>
> 1. james extends several Cornerstone classes based on Cornerstone
> implementations from back in June and I suspect that there may
> be a runtime disconnect here somewhere
> 2. problem occurs when running under Phoenix or Merlin so I think
> we can rule out containers as the issue
>
> I've put up a log with full debug level on at the following URL:
>
> http://www.osm.net/technical/james/james-log.txt
>
> Comments added to the log file are prefixed by ##.
>
> In order to resolve this problem I would like to import the modified
> James sources into avalon-sandbox to enable James and Avalon people to
> dig into this.
>
> Cheers, Steve.
>
> --
>
> Stephen J. McConnell
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
