Stephen is proposing a CVS repository of James and Avalon in Avalon Sandbox. This would be based on current CVS code and would be temporary.
- If it is based on current CVS, shouldn't it be ongoing rather than temporary ? I would expect a temporary integration codebase for well defined releases not current CVS. - It would be better to to only sync up on well defined releases rather than current CVS. Stephen do you have a release candidate of Excalibur/Cornerstone that you want to synch up with James. Or is the desire to be always in Synch within development trees. James is a user of Phonix and as long as there is a stable version of Phoenix for James all is good. Not sure why James needs to tie in into current CVS of Excalibur/Cornerstone. It seems heavy to sync up on development trees via a temporary CVS repository but if Stephen wants to do it, no harm there. Harmeet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:32 PM Subject: RE: Excalibur/Cornerstone/James woes > > Stephen, are you planning to sync with a release version of > > Excalibur/Cornerstone or with a development snapshot ? > > Harmeet, are you having trouble keeping up with james-dev? Stephen, Serge, > Nico, and I have discussed this issue in depth and in multiple message > threads. > > Stephen is one of the Avalon developers and PMC members. He is working to > prepare a formal set of Avalon Release builds. > > --- Noel > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
