On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:59, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > What's your definition of "a while"? We need a plan for removing them. > > > > How about a plan of "We don't remove them". No need to break code on a > > whim. > > How's about Avalon 5?
AValon5 refers to framework classes which are on a completely different release schedule than logkit and Logkit should never need another major version. > I agree that unless you know what your existing > client base is using, that you need not break backwards compatibility > within a major version. > > Seems to me that lesson ought to have been learned by now ... You would think... Seems silly to break backwards compatability at anytime regardless of versioinng unless there is more to gain than is lost by futzing with existing users. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *----------------------------------------------------* | "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey | *----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
