Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+1What's your definition of "a while"? We need a plan for removing them.How about a plan of "We don't remove them". No need to break code on awhim.How's about Avalon 5? I agree that unless you know what your existing client base is using, that you need not break backwards compatibility within a major version.
We have to assure that our users are confortable with mixing our deliverables easily.
Seems to me that lesson ought to have been learned by now ...
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
