>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming >Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:07 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1? > >On Atmels website: > > http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/as5-beta/avr8-gnu-toolchain- >3.2.0.255-source.zip > >there are patches for libc 1.7.1 > > 40-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega32X1.patch > 41-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega128b1.patch > 42-avr-libc-1.7.1-bug_11793_fix.patch > 50-avr-libc-1.7.1-atxmega256a3bu.patch > 51-avr-libc-1.7.1-at90pwm161.patch > 52-avr-libc-1.7.1-atmega32_5_50_90_pa.patch > >But version 1.7.1 is very new and does it need patching?
AFAIK, the functionality should not get affected even if these patches are not applied. > >Furthermore, the first two patches (40, 41) can be applied, >but compilation results in an error: > ... avr-libc-1.7.1/crt1/gcrt1.S:179: Error: non-constant expression in >".if" statement >The last application cannot be applied at all: > patching file ./include/avr/power.h > Hunk #1 FAILED at 74. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 146. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 170. > Hunk #4 FAILED at 254. > Hunk #5 FAILED at 338. > >I am curious at your opinion. > I think those patches are meant for some test devices. They contain dummy header files. Hence build errors. They can be ignored. HTH Anitha _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
