On Thursday 24 March 2011, Per Arnold Blaasmo wrote: > You guys must remember that these patches is the one Atmel currently > uses in the toolchain built for AVR Studio 5. > > It is not the official avr-libc patches. > The avr-libc might or might not accept these patches in the future and > make a new version of avr-libc with these patches. Atmel hope the > project will want to use them.
Good point! Would it be an idea to introduce a naming convention so that is clear to anyone? So instead of 40-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega32X1.patch we would have: 40-avr-libc-1.7.1-atmel-xmega32X1.patch and when the official one comes out: 40-avr-libc-1.7.1-official-xmega32X1.patch These patches could be identical when it is adopted as such by the developers in charge. But it could also be a further improved one. This would solve: > Atmel will always be in front of the community project internally so > Atmel will probably always have patches to the latest public version. and anyone else can also release his/her patches, since now it is clear that they are not yet 'approved'. Regards Ruud _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
