The test should be updated to cover the related issue
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151303
Regards,
Alexander
On 3/4/2016 1:15 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello, Sergey,
We have JLabel(icon) already in the test, and we cannot have both
these cases at the same tab. Moreover, we can in principle use some
other components as an argument of 'setTabComponentAt', but I'm not
sure that these cases have some novelty.
So my suggestion is to can simply return to the old version of the
test (which will fail on OS X) or add it commented with some "TODO:
uncomment / replace after 8151060 fix" instruction in code.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 3/4/2016 1:21 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alexander.
I suggest to add these lines to the test instead of replace the old
lines. The test will pass after the fix for 8151060.
On 03.03.16 17:45, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Could you please review the updated version of the test?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.01
Line
106 tabbedPane.addTab("", icon, p);
was replaced with
109 tabbedPane.addTab("", p);
110 tabbedPane.setTabComponentAt(0, new JLabel(icon));
- in such a case the test passes for OS X (as well as for Windows,
Linux).
Probably these changes should be reverted after JDK-8151060 fix.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 3/2/2016 7:15 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Sergey,
It fails because of
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151060
(plus we need here some tricky check for resolution by the analogy
with 8150258 because of JDK-8150844).
Thanks,
Alexander
On 2/26/2016 4:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alexander.
The test failed on osx 10.11 + retina. Is it expected?
On 26.02.16 15:53, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150724 ?
Just a single test added.
Thanks,
Alexander