Hi all,
 
Forgive my ignorare.  Can someone tell me what's RAF journal?

"Harry (Harshawardhan Deshpande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi Pritam
 
Your conclusion is correct. Please visit my site www.systomatics.biz and read the discussion on InventMovement class where I have (tried to) explain the logic.
 
**In my case I think when user has deleted un-posted RAF journal child
reference has not got removed.**

This is a bug in standard system and (me thunks) it happens because of different cachelookup property on the journal header and journal lines. This happens even with BOM journals. I tried to log this call but was told it cannot be logged since it cannot be replicated.
 
Right now the only solution is to stop allowing users from deleting the journal lines from the header. If they want to delete a journal, then click on lines to open the lines form, delete the lines and then delete the header. Simple modification (just change the delete action from cascade to restricted)
 
regards
 
harry
 

Pritam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

=> Checkbox "automatic addition" on inventory parmaeters is checked.
=> Item or warehouse is not marked for quarantine.
=> There is no customization done.

I think this is the bug as Herry and Gokhan have mentioned.

When users make on Production Order with qty 70 it creates one
Inventory Transaction line.

When users post one RAF journal with qty 5 it splits 70 into 65 and
5. The status of 70 is Ordered and status of 5 is received.

When users create one more RAF journal with qty 9 it splits 65 into
56 and 9. The status of 56 is Ordered and has no Inventory
reference, status of line with qty 9 is also Ordered but Inventory
Reference is filled as "Report as finished Journal".

In my case I think when user has deleted un-posted RAF journal child
reference has not got removed.

I have checked the code of RAF update. While picking up transaction
lines Axapta picks up lines having no reference. Hence quantity do
not balance and throws error.

Please suggest any solution to stop this ? Or suggest if above
conclusion is wrong.

I am using Axapta 3.0 with service pack 3.0

Thanks in advance

Pritam Karkhanis


--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, "Harry
\(Harshawardhan Deshpande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi

> 1. The problem with the deletion of RAF journal..
>     Did you delete the RAF that has been posted ? If yes, then
Axapta will keep the child references. If you are deleting RAF that
has not been posted then Axapta should remove the child references
(in reality it sometimes does not, this is a bug in standard axapta).
>
> 2. Splitting of the inventtrans. Do you have any transactions that
are registered etc? is the checkbox "automatic addition" on
inventory parameters checked?

> 3. second line of 65 where you do not have any reference number is
serious. Have you done any modifications?

> 4. I am stumped as to why you should get an error while posting a
quantity of zero? Can you reproduce this in standard system? May be
the problem will go away when you fix the above problem (number 3)

> regards

> harry
>
> Gokhan Can <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}o\:* {behavior:url
(#default#VML);}w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}.shape
{behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> We faced the same kind of error a lot of times.
>
> When you create a RAF journal and delete it or we could not find
actually after which action ; Axapta split inventtrans in to 2 lines
and
>
> Keep RAF referance on Inventtrans ( TransChildRefID and
TransChildRefType ) and this is dangling referance.When you delete
that
>
> Referance from inventtrans probably the problem will be fixed but
I am asking the same question does anybody know what is the real
action
>
> Cause this error bucause we opened and indicent but could not tell
the real reason so we could not fix the bug.
>

>

>
> Gokhan
>

>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Axapta-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pritam
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Not able to do RAF
>
>

>
> Dear gurus
>
> I am facing below problem in Axapta.
> I have a Production Order of quantity 70.
> It has one RAF journal with good quantity 5.
>
> So when I check Inventory->Transaction I think it should show 2
> lines as follows..
>
> (1) Ordered = 65
> (2) Raf     = 5
>
> But in my case it shows 3 lines
>
> (1) Ordered = 9
> (2) Ordered = 56
> (2) Raf     = 5
>
> For the first Line which is having quantity 9, Inventory reference
> columns (Inventory reference & Number) are filled. Second line has
> no reference attached.
>
> When I try to do RAF without any quantity to update Production
> Order's status from Route Consumption to RAF I get below error
>
> "Quantity ordered cannot be reduced, as there are not enough open
> inventory transactions with the Ordered status. The items are
> Purchased, Received or Registered"
>
> This happens because while updating status to RAF, records got
> picked up with status Ordered and having blank reference fields.
> Axapta try to reduce remaining qty (65) on order  from second line
> only.
>
> If anybody knows about this behaviour of Axapta, please let me
know
> where to check.
>
> Thank You
>
>
>
>
>
> Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Business finance course Business to business finance Small
business finance Business finance consultant Business finance
magazine Business finance uk
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>     Visit your group "Axapta-Knowledge-Village" on the web.
>  
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
>     Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>            
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! for Good
>  Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.



Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to