Yes Kristanto,
In our case, we were lucky to have a public project named "HotFixes", which
holds all objects affected by the hf layer..., even tought, I still prefer the
old and good xpo file :)
Applying an entire layer does not allow you to know so fast and clearly what
are you fixing.
Anyway, I appreciate your opinion and ask to all KV people to manifest theirs.
Regards,
André
----- Original Message -----
From: kristanto surjadi
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] New Hotfix methodology
Hi Andre,
Yes it is not convinient, but you can try to work around it. Apply the
hotfix to a standard ax,
then export to xpo all objects that are affected by the hotfix (it is
ussually stated in hotfix document). Then import the xpo to your
development/production environment.
Regards,
Kristanto
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, André Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: André Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] New Hotfix methodology
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 12:22 AM
Hello Everyone,
I would ask you all, what do you think about Microsoft's new
methodology about hotfix deployinf.
Before = XPO
Today = DIS/DIP layer.
Here in Brazil, we didn't like it at all, because, by applying an
entire layer instead of the single xpos, we can't have absolute control over
the changes made.. moreover, applying an entire layer causes huge code merging
demand when working in highly customized environments.
I'm specifically asking this group, because I know at least 95% of
you guys are Indian, and I believe that India has the same fiscal/taxes/
financial mess that we have in Brazil :)
Wait for your opinion!
Regards
Andre Santos
www.axaptabrasil. com.br
