"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On August 8, 2006 4:02 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote: | > | > > I would like to ask the other Axiom Developers for their opinion | > > about how best to handle these sort of changes to documentation | > > in the Axiom source distribution: Should we accumulate and review | > > the changes online and only then apply a cumulative patch to Silver | > > and Gold? | > | > I would very much like that there is only ONE version, namely | > axiom--test--1 editable through the wiki and that version is | > always in sync with a branch (call it silver/branches/axiom--test--1) | > on our subversion repository. | | I rather dislike these weird "arch" names. Perhaps we can define | a new branch in Silver specifically for this purpose? On the other | hand having too many branches seems like the same kind of "trap" | that we got into with arch - defining branches and then no one | shows up to maintain them and no one bothers to merge them etc. | Maybe we should just sync the Silver main branch.
I'm for that. If the silver branch is supposed to be the "live" source, then I see no reason to branch from different places. I hope to have enough cleanup on build-improvements, so that we can merge part of the work there. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer