Shankar, I have tested Rampart/C with a soap action(without addressing) and putting the Security phase even before Transport phase and it worked. So I think what is happening in this case is that actual dispatching does not happen from soap action phase dispatcher.
-Manjula. On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 12:21 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi, > > Currently rampart in-handler is called in "PreDispatch" phase in inflow. > Due to that, if a message is having only soap action (no operation is > specified in url or no wsa:action is given, so only possible way of > dispatching is based on soap action) and message is secured, security > cannot be verified. This is because, rampart needs operation to be > resolved before verifying the security of the message. If the message is > having only soap action, then when message comes to rampart, still the > operation is not resolved. > > Can somebody confirm soap action based dispatching happening on > "PreDispatch"? If so, can we introduce another phase "Security" between > "PreDispatch" and "Dispatch" and install rampart-in-handler to > "Security" phase? will it cause any problem? Any reason why > rampart-in-handler is installed in "PreDispatch" phase rather than > another phase? (I tried it and it worked) > > Comments are welcome. > > Regards, > Shankar. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
