Hi,

This article [1] written by Samisa explicitly saying we can add user defined phases only after pre-defined phases in in-flow. I guess it is added purposely. Then we have to consider some other options to invoke rampart after soap action based dispatching.

Regards,
Shankar

[1] http://wso2.org/library/777


Kaushalye Kapuruge wrote:
Thanks Manjula for this finding.
Is this a bug or added purposely?
Are there any problems if module defined phases get invoked before the default phases?
If not definitely need to fix this phase ordering problem in Axis2/C.
Cheers,
Kaushalye

Manjula Peiris wrote:
Hi,

I debug the code. What is happening here is Security phase always
invokes at last even you put it before Transport phase. Since soap
action based dispatcher is in Dispatch phase in this situation when it
comes to Rampart actual dispatching has occurred. So this means Axis2/C
always invoke module defined phases after invoking its default phases. I
think we need to fix this. I will raise a JIRA.

Thanks,
-Manjula.

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:18 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:15 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
Shankar,

I have tested Rampart/C with a soap action(without addressing) and
putting the Security phase even before Transport phase and it worked. So
I think what is happening in this case is that actual dispatching does
not happen from soap action phase dispatcher.
not happen from soap action based dispatcher.

-Manjula.

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 12:21 +0530, Uthaiyashankar wrote:
Hi,

Currently rampart in-handler is called in "PreDispatch" phase in inflow. Due to that, if a message is having only soap action (no operation is specified in url or no wsa:action is given, so only possible way of dispatching is based on soap action) and message is secured, security cannot be verified. This is because, rampart needs operation to be resolved before verifying the security of the message. If the message is having only soap action, then when message comes to rampart, still the operation is not resolved.

Can somebody confirm soap action based dispatching happening on "PreDispatch"? If so, can we introduce another phase "Security" between "PreDispatch" and "Dispatch" and install rampart-in-handler to "Security" phase? will it cause any problem? Any reason why rampart-in-handler is installed in "PreDispatch" phase rather than another phase? (I tried it and it worked)

Comments are welcome.

Regards,
Shankar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to