Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area. And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer. -- Chinthaka > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch > > Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support? > The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were > multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete > realization. > > In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer? > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch > > > > Hi dims, > > Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main > > area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM > > representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the scratch > > area for the time being. > > (Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the > > first place :)) > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area? > > > > > > -- dims > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Thilina. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ajith Ranabahu > > >
