Can we do this? let's try to be accomodating to what we accept (means accept messages with or without '<' and '>') but generate messages according to the RFC? At least till we get confirmation from the folks researching the problem?
thanks, dims On 7/19/05, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > With this mail I'm withdrawing the "Veto" I've put on Content-Id > handling on Axis2... > > I never intended to put a "Veto" when i wrote that mail. Actually I > heard about "Veto" thing only after the previous mail. I'm still > learning "the apache way" of doing things..... Pls bare with me....... > > IMHO the best thing we can do is to follow that standard (May be we > should research bit more on that and find out the best way to do it) > and get the MSFT guys too to follow it...... > > Regards, > ~Thilina > > > On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Added [axis2] to the subject.) > > > > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 14:06 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > Thilina, > > > Could you please tell me which specific svn changes you want me to > > > revert? Would it be better to fix the code to do the right thing as > > > per RFC? > > > > > > Team, > > > Please use -1 sparingly. -1 implies we have to revert all related > > > changes. Please read > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Veto. If you want to > > > make a point, make a point and not use -1 unncessarily, use it as a > > > last resort ("Vetos may not be overridden nor voted down, and only > > > cease to apply when the committer who issued the veto withdraws it.") > > > > +1 .. more email, more communication will help .. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > > -- > "May the SourcE be with u" > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/thilina > -- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
