+1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>; "Thilina Gunarathne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [axis2] Re: Dealing with MTOM veto
Can we do this? let's try to be accomodating to what we accept (means
accept messages with or without '<' and '>') but generate messages
according to the RFC? At least till we get confirmation from the folks
researching the problem?
thanks,
dims
On 7/19/05, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
With this mail I'm withdrawing the "Veto" I've put on Content-Id
handling on Axis2...
I never intended to put a "Veto" when i wrote that mail. Actually I
heard about "Veto" thing only after the previous mail. I'm still
learning "the apache way" of doing things..... Pls bare with me.......
IMHO the best thing we can do is to follow that standard (May be we
should research bit more on that and find out the best way to do it)
and get the MSFT guys too to follow it......
Regards,
~Thilina
On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Added [axis2] to the subject.)
>
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 14:06 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Thilina,
> > Could you please tell me which specific svn changes you want me to
> > revert? Would it be better to fix the code to do the right thing as
> > per RFC?
> >
> > Team,
> > Please use -1 sparingly. -1 implies we have to revert all related
> > changes. Please read
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Veto. If you want to
> > make a point, make a point and not use -1 unncessarily, use it as a
> > last resort ("Vetos may not be overridden nor voted down, and only
> > cease to apply when the committer who issued the veto withdraws it.")
>
> +1 .. more email, more communication will help ..
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
--
"May the SourcE be with u"
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/thilina
--
Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
