Hi All, The DOM impl that we have in the xml module implements the OM interfaces. Therefore I included it under org.apache.axis2.om.impl.dom.* And I expected this to be used the same way we would use the llom implementation of OM. (The linked list implementation of OM goes under org.apache.axis2.om.impl.llom.*).
But if you guys feel that the DOM stuff doesn't belong in the XML module please feel free to (re?)move it :-). But I'd still like to have a clean impl which implements DOM and OM interfaces. Thanks Ruchith On 10/28/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Steve Loughran wrote: > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > >> Should we break out the DOM2/DOM3 stuff from xml module? just like we > >> did for saaj? > >> > > > > well, the issue is that both the OMElement and the SAAJ stuff declare > > that they implement the dom interfaces, and you cannot build them on > > java1.5 without marking every impl class as abstract. So I dont think > > 'breaking out' is something > > we can do. > > This is COMPLETELY wrong idea. OM has nothing to do with dom impl. > > Actually I wanted to point this out earlier, but since Ruchith is doing > some important stuff, I kept quiet. I don't think dom impl stuff belongs > to OM. Its an extension of OM. This has made people to comment wrong on > OM, which Steve just did. > > As Dims stated, its better if we can strip this out from OM. > > -- Chinthaka > > > > > > > -- Ruchith
