I think it is important we get people testing ADB and giving us feedback.
Paul
On 10/31/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for a new release with the ADB stuff done & working.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:47 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> Hi All,
> Agreed. Will do it ASAP with right comments in the code and a seperate
> piece of documentation.
>
> On 11/1/05, Eran Chinthaka < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 point taken. Thanks. I will create a wiki for the next
> release and add the point.
>
> But still I can't see any response from others. Does this mean
> we do not need a release ? Or is it natural when I ask about
> releases, people stay silent ;-)
>
> Chinthaka
>
>
> Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > Eran
> >
> > I'd like to see the ADB documented, fully tested and I'd like to be able to
> > make it work myself!
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On 10/31/05, Steve Loughran
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Eran Chinthaka wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > We have advanced a lot since our last release. Especially we are almost
> > > > done with doc/lit handling both with ADB and XMLBeans. And we had
> > > > numerous bug fixing also.
> > > >
> > > > And I know that we are not done with RPC stuff, yet.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We know that there are lot of people trying even with our 0.92 release.
> > > > So what do you all think of going for 0.93 release ?
> > > >
> > > > The stuff we need to do before the release is to fix the relevant issues
> > > > in Jira. Anything else ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > increment the version tag in the project.xml file? I've already done
> > > this in my local copy just to deploy the file to a different version
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ajith Ranabahu
