Q: "Does Axis1 treat its SAAJ impl differently from pure SAAJ"? A: YES.
No clue about how others are doing it. -- dims On 5/24/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 08:03 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Sanjiva, > > Problem that jongjin is referring to is that when you drop our Axis2 > saaj impl into Axis1, it will blow up. I'm prolly being thick but why? "Drop our Axis2 SAAJ impl into Axis1" must imply that the person dropping it did the work to integrate it via the right factory and so forth .. and in that case its not obvious to me why it should fail. Does Axis1 treat its SAAJ impl differently from pure SAAJ?? Anyway this conversation seems to be moot: If JAX-RPC requires the old pre-DOM SAAJ per Nick's message then we are indeed doomed (not DOOMed .. which would of course imply that we're using the DOOM SAAJ). We can of course impl the old SAAJ stuff using (DO)OM underneath too. I wonder how XFire and Celtix deal with this issue- do either of them support JAX-RPC and JAX-WS simultaneously? Sanjiva.
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
