> One key thing to keep in mind still is that this stuff only applies to > Java language .. not any JVM based language. As a result, any such > features need to be kept away from the core - if we plug this beast into > Groovy or Rhino (as we've done in the WSO2 Mashup Server) then none of > these JSRs come into play at all.
Agreed... each of these should merely be facades on a generic core.
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - WebServices Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 512-838-1182
Building: 901 / 5G-016
Sanjiva
Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
ce.lk> [email protected]
cc
12/08/2007 02:49
PM Subject
Re: Axis2 architecture
documentation
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.org
Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> So does this mean you're changing your mind on JSR technologies? :)
:-). I'm not against all of it .. just the heavy useless ones ;-).
I am +1 for 183 and 211 ... annotations are useful and no one wants to
keep learning new ones.
One key thing to keep in mind still is that this stuff only applies to
Java language .. not any JVM based language. As a result, any such
features need to be kept away from the core - if we plug this beast into
Groovy or Rhino (as we've done in the WSO2 Mashup Server) then none of
these JSRs come into play at all.
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/:
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: pic06610.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
