-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeff,
yep. All 3 points are status quo w.r.t Axis2 1.3. - -- dims Jeff Barrett wrote: | Hi Folks, | | If we choose to stay on 1.4, remember that JAXWS requires Java 1.5 (due to | the spec-required use of generics). I think there are a couple of modules | that require Java 1.5 to build. Also note that in order to run the JAXWS | 2.1 TCK, that will also require Java 1.5 since the TCK will test the use | of generics. | | So, staying on Java 1.4 and supporting JAXWS probably means something | like: | - We have to be building with Java 1.5 to get JAXWS built | - We state that Axis2 can be run on 1.4 without JAXWS (as was true in the | past) | - To use Axis2 with JAXWS, you have to use Java 1.5 | | Thanks, | Jeff | | IBM Software Group - WebSphere Web Services Development | Phone: 512-838-4587 or Tie Line 678-4587 | Internet e-mail and Sametime ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | "Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 02/27/2008 05:15 AM | Please respond to | [email protected] | | | To | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cc | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> | Subject | Re: [Axis2] Moving Axis2 code base into JDK 1.5 | | | | | | | +1 to moving to Java 5. I think maintenance releases could be key in | keeping those users tied to Java 1.4, interested in Axis2 until | they're ready to move up to Java 5 themselves. | | Jeremy | | On 27/02/2008, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> Yes I guess that makes sense. |> However, its most likely that we would roll up whatever is in the | trunk. |> I guess that there might be also end up being a 1.4.1 maintenance |> release as well. |> |> |> Paul |> |> |> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Michele Mazzucco |> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> > Paul, |> > |> > if so, I think release 1.4 should focus on fixing as much bugs as |> > possible, not on adding new features. |> > |> > Michele |> > |> > |> > |> > On 27 Feb 2008, at 09:59, Paul Fremantle wrote: |> > |> > > My concern is that I think there has been a lot of work done since | the |> > > last release and the JDK1.4 users will never get that benefit. |> > > |> > > So - how about this for a plan. |> > > |> > > Release 1.4 asap based on JDK 1.4. |> > > Then do a 1.5 release *very soon after* based on JDK1.5. |> > > |> > > That way even the names match :) |> > > |> > > Axis2 1.4 can be the last major release targeted at JDK1.4. |> > > |> > > As for 1.5, I think in fact it will need two releases - once we | start |> > > targeting 1.5 we probably need to do some 1.5 specific stuff like |> > > generating code that takes advantage of generics. |> > > |> > > Paul |> > > |> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Dennis Sosnoski | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> > > wrote: |> > >> From my experiences working with companies moving to Axis2 I'd | say |> > >> about half are still using JDK 1.4. If they can't count on that |> > >> support |> > >> being maintained I think they're likely to reconsider adopting |> > >> Axis2. |> > >> Just having an archived 1.3 version of Axis2 won't be enough to |> > >> convince |> > >> them, unless they're already committed to moving to JDK 1.5 | anyway. |> > >> |> > >> It seems like bad timing to give up one of the major advantages |> > >> of Axis2 |> > >> over the Glassfish code and such. So -0 from me. |> > >> |> > >> - Dennis |> > >> |> > >> -- |> > >> Dennis M. Sosnoski |> > >> SOA and Web Services in Java |> > >> Axis2 Training and Consulting |> > >> http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz |> > >> Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 |> > >> |> > >> |> > >> |> > >> |> > >> |> > >> Deepal Jayasinghe wrote: |> > >>> Hi all , |> > >>> |> > >>> As you might remember few months back Glen asked the list about |> > >>> moving |> > >>> to JDK 1.5 and I think we got very positive feedback. So I |> > >>> thought of |> > >>> asking again and change the code to work with JDK 1.5 . The main |> > >>> reason behind sending this mail is due the dependency we have | for |> > >>> annogen. As I can see that project is dead one and there is no |> > >>> development happening so I do not think it is a good idea to |> > >>> depend on |> > >>> such a project. In the meantime we have few issues with annogen | as |> > >>> well ,first inner class problem (I have locally fixed that both | in |> > >>> Axis2 and Annogen will commit soon) , second is the final class |> > >>> problem. I request a release from annogen after the changes that |> > >>> Dims |> > >>> did , but we did not get any reply so far. |> > >>> |> > >>> We all know that we get better annotation support from JDK 1.5 | so if |> > >>> we move to JDK 1.5 we can get rid of the annogen dependency and |> > >>> we can |> > >>> just use JDK for annotation processing. Other problem is | generic |> > >>> support , if we move to JDK 1.5 we can have generic support in | our |> > >>> POJOs. In addition to POJO we can get better concurrent support | in |> > >>> JDK 1.5 as well. |> > >>> |> > >>> So if we move to JDK 1.5 we can get better support , and I do | not |> > >>> think any advantage of staying in 1.4 . If some user want to use |> > >>> Axis2 |> > >>> in JDK 1.4 they can happily use Axis2 1.3 , which is very stable |> > >>> version and working fine in 1.4 and 1.5. |> > >>> |> > >>> If any user or developers have any concern on moving to JDK 1.5 |> > >>> please |> > >>> come forward and reply to this mail that will be very helpful | for |> > >>> all |> > >>> of us. |> > >>> |> > >>> Here is my +1 for moving to JDK 1.5 to and release Axis2 1.4 in |> > >>> JDK 1.5 |> > >>> |> > >>> Thank you, |> > >>> Deepal |> > >>> |> > >>> |> > >>> | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |> > >>> - |> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > >>> |> > >> |> > >> |> > >> | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > >> |> > >> |> > > |> > > |> > > |> > > -- |> > > Paul Fremantle |> > > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 |> > > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair |> > > |> > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org |> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > > |> > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com |> > > |> > > | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > > |> > |> > |> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> > |> > |> |> |> |> -- |> Paul Fremantle |> Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 |> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair |> |> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com |> |> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |> | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFHxXTRgNg6eWEDv1kRAj/zAJwI2YhqdbFLXp9+PTaH9tWGKF/BzQCg6SOW WJhsDffNlUFzv8zPmbrgVPA= =EkRD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
