-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jarek,
So, can you please do a svn cp right now and get them going? and start putting out SNAPSHOT's? thanks, dims Jarek Gawor wrote: | Yeah, but that doesn't matter. The spec modules are separate from rest | of the Geronimo code so we can still move the API modules but they | wouldn't be used in the Geronimo server right away. | | Jarek | | On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |> Hash: SHA1 |> |> Jarek, |> |> +1 to move the spec jars, now that they are pretty stable and have gone |> thru the TCK's. One question there is Geronimo |> is still on JAXWS 2.0. So that may be a block. |> |> - -- dims |> |> |> |> Jarek Gawor wrote: |> | I don't see that as a good reason to move these API classes into |> | kernel. In fact, in my opinion that makes things more confusing. I |> | think keeping these things separate is cleaner, easier to understand, |> | and more reusable. Another thing to understand is that these are API |> | classes which are far more stable then rest of the Axis2 code. |> | Therefore, they should really have their own releases separate from |> | Axis2 releases (something we do in Geronimo). Also, like Dims said, in |> | Java 6 these API classes are provided by the JVM, so why would you |> | want to have these classes in the kernel jar even though they will not |> | be used at runtime (unless you want to start creating Java-specific |> | versions of the kernel jar). |> | |> | On related note, at one point I suggested moving all the Axis2 API |> | modules (saaj-api, jws-api, jaxws-api) into Geronimo (into specs). I |> | still think that's a good idea and maybe it would be good to |> | reconsider. As I mentioned before, there is no good reason why these |> | modules should be compiled everytime you build Axis2 and there is no |> | reason to release these modules with each Axis2 release. And if we |> | move these API modules into Geronimo specs, these modules could nicely |> | be reused in a number of other Apache projects such as CXF, Geronimo, |> | Harmony, etc. |> | |> | Jarek |> | |> | On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> wrote: |> |> Hi all, |> |> When I was removing annogen dependency I realized that importance of |> |> moving JWS-API into the kernel. The reason is that those classes are |> used |> |> many places in Axis2, so having them in the kernel is much easier than |> |> adding one more dependency to JWS-API. |> |> |> |> Thoughts ... ? |> |> |> |> Thank you! |> |> Deepal |> |> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> |> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |> |> |> |> | |> | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> | |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) |> |> iD8DBQFIIGj9gNg6eWEDv1kRAo02AKCwG67AqkJh3bPI0Kp7SB+AYFd0DACfY7ic |> 24XRfv/FUJEElvVDWR7A3T0= |> =nIWB |> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |> |> |> |> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> |> | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFIIGu1gNg6eWEDv1kRAh8RAJ9eTca3hm9KjIiZPqkclAtcYKd2RwCgsNKk ZijmnBcTIwInfPpSullnVFA= =EMvp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
