After reading all the mails , I still in the position that , YES we need
to support OSGi. But , its better if we can do that without changing the
core module. So I will help my best to write a OSGi based Axis
configurator which does not touches the existing core code base
(deployment side of it) , but will make sure to have what Saminda
mentioned in the initial mail.
Comments .... ??
-Deepal
Over in Apache Tuscany we're actively working on changing to have OSGi
a more integral part of the SCA runtime so anything Axis2 does to be
more OSGi friendly would be useful to Tuscany.
...ant
*Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
13/06/2008 10:06
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Extensions to Axis2/Java deployment engine
Hi Venkat,
I really appreciate your post , if there are users like who really need
OSGi , then we really should consider providing OSGi support out of
the box.
> I agree. Currently I'm evaluating Axis2.0 for embedding it in one of
> our products which is built on equinox platform. If Axis2.0 features
> are available as OSGi bundles, it would help Axis2.0 adaption in
> future, I guess.
>
> - venkat
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/
/
/Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
