Yes it is. It's a separate jar and it's name is org.apache.axis2.osgi_<version>.jar. :)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Saminda, > > Can we please keep the OSGi stuff in separate maven module for now? We can > still use maven magic to generate a > axis2-kernel and axis2-adb jar with whatever you need inside, but as an > artifact inside the OSGi maven module. > > That will avoid dragging in osgi jars in the main build and keep everyone > happy till we convince them :) > > thanks, > dims > > > Saminda Abeyruwan wrote: > | Hi Devs, > | > | First phase of the implementation plan is to use axis2-kernel, axis2-adb > and > | create the org.apache.axis2.osgi_<version>.jar bundle, which will salvage > | some existing code from current Axis2 OSGi implementation. New > | implementation will include the activator, builders, and most importantly > | AxisConfigurator. I will package legacy jars as bundles and use the > existing > | bundles, which will be fully operational in Equinox. Will provide you > with > | the working sample asap. > | > | I wanted to write the activator and stuff to axis2-kernel and axis2-adb > | itself. But for the first step lets provide this as an extension. > | > | Thank you! > | > | Saminda > | > | On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > |> I haven't finished wading through the whole thread on this, but I fully > |> support Deepal's position that Axis2 should focus on supporting its user > |> base by not breaking things. > |> > |> There is functionality that users have asked for (hey, do we support > |> consuming rpc/encoded services via ADB yet?) that would seem to me > |> should take priority over OSGi. > |> > |> -- > |> Tom Jordahl > |> > |> -----Original Message----- > |> From: Deepal jayasinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:26 AM > |> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > |> Subject: Re: Extensions to Axis2/Java deployment engine > |> > |> After reading all the mails , I still in the position that , YES we need > |> > |> to support OSGi. But , its better if we can do that without changing the > |> > |> core module. So I will help my best to write a OSGi based Axis > |> configurator which does not touches the existing core code base > |> (deployment side of it) , but will make sure to have what Saminda > |> mentioned in the initial mail. > |> > |> Comments .... ?? > |> > |> -Deepal > |>> Over in Apache Tuscany we're actively working on changing to have OSGi > |>> a more integral part of the SCA runtime so anything Axis2 does to be > |>> more OSGi friendly would be useful to Tuscany. > |>> > |>> ...ant > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> *Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* > |>> > |>> 13/06/2008 10:06 > |>> Please respond to > |>> axis-dev@ws.apache.org > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> To > |>> axis-dev@ws.apache.org > |>> cc > |>> > |>> Subject > |>> Re: Extensions to Axis2/Java deployment engine > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> Hi Venkat, > |>> > |>> I really appreciate your post , if there are users like who really > |> need > |>> OSGi , then we really should consider providing OSGi support out of > |>> the box. > |>>> I agree. Currently I'm evaluating Axis2.0 for embedding it in one of > |>>> our products which is built on equinox platform. If Axis2.0 features > |>>> are available as OSGi bundles, it would help Axis2.0 adaption in > |>>> future, I guess. > |>>> > |>>> - venkat > |>>> > |>>> > |>> > |>> > |>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > |>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > |>> / > |>> / > |>> > |>> /Unless stated otherwise above: > |>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > |>> number 741598. > |>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > |>> 3AU/ > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |>> > |> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > |> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> > |> > |> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > |> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> > |> > | > | > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) > > iD8DBQFIV6tpgNg6eWEDv1kRAsdVAKChiZOjplARJPOFJnKDbd2Ya58U5wCfQ4R/ > QjZ3ykpffoPG4g22OmpU9IE= > =TAax > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Saminda Abeyruwan Senior Software Engineer WSO2 Inc. - www.wso2.org
