Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
we can do some thing like that Jboss does. In Jboss if you want to
deploy a web application either it should be put as .war file or under a
directory of which name ends with .war .
i.e in axis2 point of view either it should be bar.aar file or bar.aar
directory.
Sounds good .. I like it; less options and "magic" the better.
In my point of view always deployer should only map to an extension. In
the above way it can support both expanded and single file modes.
Yes, but a given deployer can of course support multiple extensions - like
for POJOs support .class and .jar both.
In Axis2.xml level we should be able to define deployment
directories.(In most case one is enough).
These directories can have files with any extension and relevant
deployer can be used to deploy these files. In http case service path is
determined relative to this directory.
+1.
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
