> > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com > <mailto:deep...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > If you feel so I am so sorry, it was not intensional, I really like > Axis2 not because I have contributed to it but because it is a useful > project. When I see someone try to break something in the project > it is > hard for me to keep silent. > > > But 40 minutes prior to that in reply to Andreas' mail you wrote: > > ===== > It is so sad to hear this, I know you contributed a lot and helped to > move the project forward. When we implement a feature we can not > consider all the projects using it. Just think one more time, we really > need your help ....., I really value your contribution. > ===== I am sorry . I think my bad English made you misunderstand what I meant .
As I mentioned Axis2 is a very useful project and we can not make the changes as we wish (since the project is matured). If I had a chance to go though Andreas's patch I would have argued the same way as I did with Isuru. Having said that when I implement a feature we can not consider all the projects using it (For example I do not know what kind of features of Axis2 that Tuscany uses), however if I know I am going to break some of the existing stuff in Axis2 I will not do that or will not let others to do it (like in Isuru's case). But if I got to know that I have break something on other dependent project (though JIRA or emails) , then I would consider fixing the issue to solve their problem too. > > So its ok for one person to break things (Andreas, which is what > started this thread) I hope you can understand it is hard for me to find time to go though Axis2 mails, when Andreas's patch mailing thread taking place I was so busy with my assignments so did not have time. Unfortunately I had a chance to go though Isuru's mail yesterday, that wasted my whole day for nothing. > but not the other (Isuru, on the hierarchical service stuff)? Why the > double standard? > It is not double stand, I already mentioned the rational behind that. It about time...,Otherwise I do not care who the person is if he trying to break anything, I have done that to Dims, Glen, Amila and few others (of course when I had time). I think this will be the last time I am going to say "NO" to any new feature adding or existing stuff breaking, I will simply do not care it anymore (I do not have time to waste). But will still to reply to mails in axis-user list. Thanks, Deepal > (I haven't read thru the hierarchical service thread yet; I will and I > will reply to it - my belief is that it doesn't need to break anything > that works now but maybe the way its been done is not that way. Anyway > I will read thru that thread and reply later. > > Sanjiva. > -- > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. > Founder, Director & Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation; > http://www.opensource.lk/ > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ > > Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ -- Thank you! http://blogs.deepal.org http://deepal.org
