On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com > > <mailto:deep...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > If you feel so I am so sorry, it was not intensional, I really like > > Axis2 not because I have contributed to it but because it is a useful > > project. When I see someone try to break something in the project > > it is > > hard for me to keep silent. > > > > > > But 40 minutes prior to that in reply to Andreas' mail you wrote: > > > > ===== > > It is so sad to hear this, I know you contributed a lot and helped to > > move the project forward. When we implement a feature we can not > > consider all the projects using it. Just think one more time, we really > > need your help ....., I really value your contribution. > > ===== > I am sorry . I think my bad English made you misunderstand what I meant . > > As I mentioned Axis2 is a very useful project and we can not make the > changes as we wish (since the project is matured). If I had a chance > to go though Andreas's patch I would have argued the same way as I did > with Isuru. Andreas, If Deepal saw your patch, I am sure it is not get commited anyway :). > > > Having said that when I implement a feature we can not consider all the > projects using it (For example I do not know what kind of features of > Axis2 that Tuscany uses), however if I know I am going to break some of > the existing stuff in Axis2 I will not do that or will not let others to > do it (like in Isuru's case). But if I got to know that I have break > something on other dependent project (though JIRA or emails) , then I > would consider fixing the issue to solve their problem too. > > > > So its ok for one person to break things (Andreas, which is what > > started this thread) > I hope you can understand it is hard for me to find time to go though > Axis2 mails, when Andreas's patch mailing thread taking place I was so > busy with my assignments so did not have time. Unfortunately I had a > chance to go though Isuru's mail yesterday, that wasted my whole day for > nothing. > > but not the other (Isuru, on the hierarchical service stuff)? Why the > > double standard? > > > It is not double stand, I already mentioned the rational behind that. It > about time...,Otherwise I do not care who the person is if he trying to > break anything, I have done that to Dims, Glen, Amila and few others (of > course when I had time). Andreas, Now you can understand what I tried to say. Please try to go through the this deployment thread and take your own judgement of warring about Axis2 breaking and stopping some one doing a new thing. Hope you realise there is no reason you to resign from Axis2 because of the discussion you have mentioned :). thanks, Amila. > > > I think this will be the last time I am going to say "NO" to any new > feature adding or existing stuff breaking, I will simply do not care it > anymore (I do not have time to waste). But will still to reply to mails > in axis-user list. > > Thanks, > Deepal > > (I haven't read thru the hierarchical service thread yet; I will and I > > will reply to it - my belief is that it doesn't need to break anything > > that works now but maybe the way its been done is not that way. Anyway > > I will read thru that thread and reply later. > > > > Sanjiva. > > -- > > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. > > Founder, Director & Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation; > > http://www.opensource.lk/ > > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ > > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > > Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ > > > > Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ > > > -- > Thank you! > > > http://blogs.deepal.org > http://deepal.org > > -- Amila Suriarachchi WSO2 Inc. blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
