Eric, that is not quite correct. There are two different things, namely the
invocation style and the encoding style. The BP supports both rpc and
document invocation style, but only literal XML encoding style. In other
words, SOAP encoding, which is reponsible for 90% of the interoperability
issues, is excluded.
Andre Tost
Eric Rajkovic
<eric.rajkovic@or To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
acle.com> cc:
Subject: Re: Document style web
services
11/21/2002 10:58
PM
Please respond to
axis-user
Anne,
Just a little addition to your comment on WS-I BP:
"WS-I has just published its Basic Profile
draft, which only supports document-style"
In the current published revision, the profile support both rpc
and document styles. It only restrict the use to literal.
eric
- Re: Document style web services Eric Rajkovic
- Re: Document style web services Steve Loughran
- Re: Document style web services Martin Jericho
- RE: Document style web services Paul Faulkner
- RE: Document style web services Anne Thomas Manes
- RE: Document style web services Heitzso
- RE: Document style web services Paul Faulkner
- RE: Document style web services Crawford, Matt
- RE: Document style web services Vidyanand Murunikkara
- Re: Document style web services Steve Loughran
- RE: Document style web services Andre Tost
- RE: Document style web services Marion . Morrison
- RE: Document style web services Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: Document style web services Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: Document style web services Bill de h�ra
- Re: Document style web services Pae Choi
- RE: Document style web services Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: Document style web services Pae Choi
- RE: Document style web service... Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: Document style web service... Steve Loughran
- Re: Document style web ser... Dennis Sosnoski
