Vic Cekvenich wrote:
So I found your proejct while reading the performance link you posted. VERY Impresive.At some point I'll add support to JiBX for automatic generation of the binding definition + schema from Java classes, and with some customization hooks that should be able to handle most things you throw at it. I'm not sure if that's exactly what you mean, though.
I currently use Caucho's Burlap buecuase I do not have to map bindings. So I have a WISH: Is there a way that JibxSoap could support geenric maping of
List method(Map parms); //?
And List or Map could be a very complex and variable object, I just don't want to have to map the thing in xml for each variation.
tia, .V
I'd also like to support the wrapped convention for remoting method calls as doc/lit in JibxSoap. Right now it only supports passing objects each way (a very literal interpretation of doc/lit, if you'll pardon my pun), which can be inconvenient for working with existing code (you'd need to create your own wrapper class for the parameters used by a method, and define a binding for that class). This is easy to handle on the server end, a little less easy to handle for the client since it means generating a class that exposes the method call.
Right now my priority is getting the base JiBX code to production release, so JibxSoap progress is probably going to be slow for a while. It's always possible that I'll get some commercial clients wanting to use it, though, and if money enters into the picture things can change amazingly fast. ;-)
- Dennis
