On Tuesday 25 November 2003 8:49 am, Robin Berjon wrote: > S Woodside wrote: > > On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 08:12 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > >> For the forms stuff, stealing from Cocoon and looking into that > >> server-side implementation of XForms (that converts to HTML+script) > >> from IBM would imho be interesting steps. For the WS part, I think > >> that making U-shaped pipelines easier to set up and use would do most > >> of the job (to allow others to build stuff more easily). I think we > >> can do without support for SOAP/RPC (which most big cos are giving up > >> on anyway) and focus on supporting document/literal SOAP, which fits > >> our idea of a document much better IMHO. > > > > does this mean the same as "roundtripping" the data? > > Hmm, no, at least I don't think so. Which part made you think that? Did > you have anything more in mind?
I would think round-tripping would be fairly trivial if you have document/literal SOAP, its basically just a file upload at that point, with validation of the instance most likely. Everything else can happen client-side. -- Tod Harter Giant Electronic Brain http://www.giantelectronicbrain.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
