On Samstag, 6. August 2016 10:27:08 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: [...] > > For data packets, I'm not quite sure, though. Could be interesting > > to not restrict that now to still allow enhancements regarding > > privacy, I think. And zero-source MAC addresses shouldn't harm > > anything in the case of data packets, should they? > > So you would prefer here that is_broadcast_ether_addr is replaced > for bcast and ucast packets with is_multicast_ether_addr? Same for > patch 2, right?
Hm, no. This doesn't make any sense for patch 2 because patch 2 is about the
destination and a destination with zero mac address isn't valid. Or do you see
any reason to accept zero mac addresses as destination in the outer ethernet
header?
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
