> Software:
> Charge for support
> Charge for bespoke software
> Charge for custom modifications.

Now this is a model we know works because there's a multiple of
companies in the OpenSource world.  So it's a no brainer.
 
> Music:
> Charge for Live performances/concerts
> Charge for physical merchandise

Musical revenues are not something I know huge amounts, but this seems
to me to be a model which drives the musicians very very hard.  To earn
money to live they have to perform - and they'll need to do it a LOT.
But to prepare their next album, they'll need to stop performing because
they'll need to write their album.

And is there not a finite amount of gigs people will attend?  The number
of people who go to a gig a week isn't that high. 

Where does this model leave people like Kate Bush - internationally
regarded and loved, but who hates doing live performances, so doesn't.  

As for merchandise, I like music, but I can count on my fingers the
number of band related merchandise I own.  It's a Shirehorses t-shirt.


As an aside, Ash recently announced they'd no longer be releasing
Albums.  Instead they're going for downloadable singles - which of
course people will pay for.  Tracks they think will be released quicker
and more often.

 
> Film:
> Charge the cinemas (but give the DVDs etc away) Or do like 
> some of the community film projects (like the one mentioned 
> on this list http://www.aswarmofangels.com/ )
> Job done.

How does this fund films which don't do very well in the cinemas but
have done far better off the back of DVD sales?  Clerks is an
interesting example.  It grossed millions in the US, yet had minimal
cinematic release.  Yet it's a highly regarded film and I suspect
there's more than one person on this list who has a copy somewhere.

DVD revenues now regularly eclipse box office reciepts.  So your model
could destroy huge chunks of the film industry.    That might be a good
thing, but it's very hard to see how Lord of the Rings would ever have
been made under your model.  The potential box office revenues alone
wouldn't have cut the mustard.


To look forward is not easy.  To find workable solutions isn't.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to