On 05/12/2007, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My usual response to this argument is that essentially you are asking > for the freedom to restrict the freedom. This is patently absurd.
Actually I'd compare free speech; it's not free speech unless it difficult to hear what I'm saying. Similarly it's not software freedom unless it's hard to bear what I'm doing to your code. Vijay.
