On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 03:11:28PM +0000, Frank Wales wrote:
> So, am I supposed to conclude that:
> 
> > 43.2 Floods body is missing policeman
> 
> is noticeably easier to read than:
> 
> > 22.6 Whisky body backs safe drinking

Well, use of the word "body" is less ambiguous in the first 
headline. Also, if I knew nothing about the stories I could
conclude that a policeman, who had been missing, had drowned
in floods and his body been discovered. However I don't know
anything about a "whisky body" and I can't guess at what it
means other than a group of either whisky drinkers or 
distillers? I would have to read that story to understand it.
Also, what is "safe drinking" - is drinking ever "safe"? etc.

-- 
Flash Bristow     -        www.gorge.org        -    07939 579090
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
My best friend is disabled and urgently needs a communication aid
   - please watch the short video at http://www.imogenmay.com

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to