Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes: > On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote: > > I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of > > rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do > > an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl. > > Your point is well-taken and I'm willing to accept your expertise on the > subject. It's not bad to harp on a subject if it's important. :)
The key parts of File::RsyncP are written in C for exactly this reason. The fileList part of the code (storing the entire file list in memory) should have similar memory usage to the rsync version. Craig ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/