On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:07:11 -0700 Craig Barratt wrote: > Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes: > > > On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote: > > > I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of > > > rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do > > > an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl. > > > > Your point is well-taken and I'm willing to accept your expertise on the > > subject. It's not bad to harp on a subject if it's important. :) > > The key parts of File::RsyncP are written in C for exactly this > reason. The fileList part of the code (storing the entire file > list in memory) should have similar memory usage to the rsync > version. > > Craig
Craig, How does this relate to the memory usage figures I posted? 527MB BackupPC_dump 250MB rsync 425MB BackupPC_dumpe Are these resonable numbers for 47GB in 2.9M files, or is something amiss? Thanks. David ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
