dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> please be  aware of  tape drive limitations  and dont try  to rotate
> tapes indefinitely.  you should only rotate tapes a few times if you
> intend on using them for long  term archival.  you really have a lot
> of options and  you can determin them by the  size of your backups. 
> if  your backups are  under 72GB  then DAT72  is the  obvious choice
> because it is common, proven,  and the tapes are inexpensive and the
> drives are not to bad($300-$400)

> if you  need more  you can get  LTO drives  which are twice  as much
> money for the drive, $35 for the tape, and hold 400GB uncompressed.

> somewhere in the middle is  the VXA-2 drives though higher end VXA-2
> drives can match LTO drives what is your budget?  how large are your
> backups?   consider that  using a  removable  hard disk  might be  a
> better option  for you.  you can put  a drive in a  hot-swap tray or
> even in a USB2 enclosure and  get a few big 500+GB drives.  benefits
> are MUCH MUCH faster  backups, MUCH faster restores, nearly infinite
> reuse or rotation  or disks, variable capacity so  you can get 120GB
> drives now  and then when  your data grows  you can just  get bigger
> drives and keep the other drives around for long term archival.

>
>
> On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 PM, Marc D Ronell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>

>                I     need      suggestions     for    tape     drive
>      hardware/cartridges  for home  server backup.  Approximately 40
>      Gigs of data.  I just tried  to upgrade my DDS4  tape drive for
>      server backup  to a  DAT 72  (DDS5).  I  was  told by  both the
>      sales  people and  the manufacturer that the  new  DAT 72 could
>       read my  old  DDS4  tapes.  But I   tried two drives  and both
>       irretrievably jammed and needed to   be sent back with my test
>      tapes stuck fast in the mechanisms.

>      Is there a  tape hardware platform which is  inexpensive enough
>      to use at home and also contains a good upgrade path?

>      Thanks,     
>      Marc     
>      --     

I think perhaps I wasn't clear in my original post.

I am  seeking an alternative  to DAT 72.   Clearly, my tests  with the
hardware show that  some versions which claim to be  able to read DDS4
tapes can not.

What are  the best hardware alternatives  for tape backup of  < 72G of
data instead of DAT 72.  Right now, I am not sure DAT 72 is reliable.

Thanks,

Marc



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to